Why There Is No More Way Around Artlist for Video Creators

Written By Valuable Views

Our review contains a few affiliate marketing links. If you purchase any of the tools, we might receive a small commission.

Artlist has kept me busy lately. Ever since I first tested them a few months ago, they kept adding new AI video models to their already wide range of offers. The company used to focus mostly on music and sound effects for videos. Those days are long gone. Artlist is becoming a one-stop shop for video makers.

I already loved that they have a great AI image generator integration with Google's Gemini Flash 2.5, plus Veo 3 for AI video generation, video footage, background music, sound effects and a voice generator. But now with their latest integration of ByteDance's (home of TikTok) Seedance 1.0 and Kling 2.5, I am finally sold on Artlist for AI video generation.

The value is huge, especially given their modular price structure. You only pay for what you need and use. But if it's all, it's still just $39 per month. If you're ready to commit for a year, you even only pay for 10 months.

Enough of the praise. Let's see how well the two new AI video models perform and if they are all that. After all, new kids on the block often enjoy undeserved hype.

What Seedance 1.0 and Kling 2.5 Promise

Kling 2.5 Turbo focuses on creating videos with good prompt accuracy and smooth camera movements. This AI video generation tool can handle complex prompts quite well and maintains character consistency throughout the video. It generates videos up to 5 or 10 seconds long with stable motion and improved detail rendering. Kling 2.5 works well for action sequences, character movements, and scenes that require multiple elements to move naturally at the same time.

Seedance 1.0 This AI video generator creates super-realistic, multi-shot videos up to 12 seconds long with great prompt coherence, and relatively low credit use compared to other video models within Artlist.

Seedance 1.0 produces good quality videos with smooth and stable motion generation. The AI video model can create clips up to 12 seconds long and offers multi-shot storytelling capabilities. It generates 1080p resolution videos at 24fps and uses an efficient rendering process that requires fewer credits compared to some other AI video models. The tool supports both text-to-video and image-to-video generation, with consistent visual quality across different shots.



Artlist test image for image-to-video test of kling 2.5 and seedance 1.0

The test image, generated previously also on Artlist.

Comparing Seedance 1.0 vs Kling 2.5 for Image-to-Video

So let's compare the two AI video tools and see which one works better for image-to-video generation. I tested both with the image-to-video feature and gave them both the same image I previously created also in Artlist. I was especially intrigued by Kling 2.5’s promise to move multiple elements naturally and therefore gave it a prompt focusing on this.

This was my prompt for Seedance 1.0 and Kling 2.5:

"Animate a warm handshake between a humanoid robot and a woman in slow motion, emphasizing the connection. The robot's LED lights softly glow in sync with movements, while the woman's expression shows joy and curiosity. Into the background the milky way appears and looks magical."

Not too complicated, but still with a few details that test the AI video models' capabilities and especially requests various movements at once.


My Test Results with Kling 2.5

My rating for Kling 2.5: 5/5

Pros:

  • Various movements are possible at once in a natural-looking way

  • The Milky Way background looks great with cinematic quality

  • The movements look natural (even if the handshake is a bit long)

  • Better overall AI video model performance

  • The cutting-edge technology is shown in the output quality

  • I like that she took his hand, as if to emphasize the connection

Cons:

  • The transition between the normal sky and Milky Way could be smoother.

Overall pretty good! And mind you , this was the first generation without adjusting the prompt at all.

My Test Results with Seedance 1.0

My rating for Seedance 1.0: 3/5

Pros:

  • I especially like the background with the milky way - it looks really cool and magical as I had prompted

  • I like the woman's movement - it looks natural and how a human moves when excited

  • The AI video generation handled the complex prompt well overall

Cons:

  • The milky way enters the scene a bit late

  • They shake hands for too long and there is a weird pause

  • Motion performance could be smoother

Final Thoughts on AI Video Generation with Artlist

Both Seedance 1.0 and Kling 2.5 show that Artlist is serious about becoming the go-to platform for video creators. While Seedance 1.0 offers good results with fewer credits, Kling 2.5 delivers superior cinematic AI video generation that justifies its position as a premium AI video model. For creators looking for the best AI video generation quality, Kling 2.5 is the clear winner in this comparison. It's great to have tools with different strengths in one platform because then you don't always use up all the credits for simpler tasks. I'll get the popcorn out to continue watching how Artlist reinvents itself again and again.

I’ve mentioned their big banger deal of giving you 2 months for free if you sign up now for an annual plan, let me hand this generous offer to you directly:

 
Valuable Views
Next

We ditched Free AI Music Generators and never looked back